<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for No Limit Hold&#039;em Strategy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nolimitstrategy.net/comments/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nolimitstrategy.net</link>
	<description>Learn how to beat No Limit Texas Hold&#039;em Poker</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 18:14:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Online Poker: Full Tilt Poker Nearing New Investment Deal by Christian Potyrala</title>
		<link>http://www.nolimitstrategy.net/poker-news/online-poker-breaking-news-full-tilt-poker-nearing-new-investment-deal/1637/comment-page-1#comment-4059</link>
		<dc:creator>Christian Potyrala</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 18:14:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nolimitstrategy.net/?p=1637#comment-4059</guid>
		<description>What do you mean &quot;many people have correctly pointed out, ...... , that the company is categorically not a &quot;Ponzi Scheme&#039; &quot;....it may not have started out as a &#039;Ponzi&#039; / pyramid type scheme...but it ended up much like one....or at the very least...a &#039;private bank&#039; who &#039;LOOTED&#039; customers accounts...a better analogy for you Carl. Surely they could have operated a fairly lucrative business and profited handsomely on the rake alone....but they TOOK money that DID NOT belong to them...to the tune of $300+ million. Semantics aside,these are guys are thieves Carl !!! Not a fact to be overlooked.
                Christian</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What do you mean &#8220;many people have correctly pointed out, &#8230;&#8230; , that the company is categorically not a &#8220;Ponzi Scheme&#8217; &#8220;&#8230;.it may not have started out as a &#8216;Ponzi&#8217; / pyramid type scheme&#8230;but it ended up much like one&#8230;.or at the very least&#8230;a &#8216;private bank&#8217; who &#8216;LOOTED&#8217; customers accounts&#8230;a better analogy for you Carl. Surely they could have operated a fairly lucrative business and profited handsomely on the rake alone&#8230;.but they TOOK money that DID NOT belong to them&#8230;to the tune of $300+ million. Semantics aside,these are guys are thieves Carl !!! Not a fact to be overlooked.<br />
                Christian</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

